Language cannot be a cause of mutual alienation and hostility Communication is central to all living entities. Plants communicate; Organisms and animals communicate; And, of course, humans communicate. They communicate not only among themselves but also among different classes and castes. The examples are many, examples are many, therefore, there is no need to overemphasize this aspect of communication. The major concern is not with the act of communication, but with the methods of communication. For example, the uses and physiology of communication in plants are well mapped, but not many have attempted a comprehensive research study of plant communication. Plants do not make sounds in the same way that animals, insects or some other living things do. This makes communication between insects and animals a bit more efficient. The cry of an insect of one kind or another is an act of communication, as indeed are howling, barking, howling, and such acts among animals and among all species. All these creatures make sounds through their throats and mouths, and based on the sound coming from inside the animal, it is encoded and decoded. There are voices of fear, as there are voices of invitation. There are angry voices and nothing but peace and a call to try to gather a group or warn of a danger. Taken all together, the derivation is clear: 'communication' is not just a human phenomenon. It is as rich as the mind of the entity. A dog, for example, communicates in many ways and is capable of vocalizations such as cooing, matching, warning, and more. A dog's voice varies from species to species and from breed to breed. It is another matter that not many texts have been written on the subject, and therefore very little is available on the language of dogs. Even in humans, not all species have a single script, yet within species, they communicate. The matter does not end here. Even among humans, as indicated, there are many variations among human species that do not have a script for their own language but still communicate with each other. The difficulty in such a situation is the lack of standardization and communication that the group needs when dealing with a new group. Thus, there is a geographical limit to the expansion and range of languages. In more evolved forms of the human species, a script is available, and after a period of practice, the script is evaluated relatively. In ancient times, there was a Roman script, a Dravidian script, a Devanagari script, and a Chinese script; There may be other scripts that are no longer alive but must have existed. As time passed and the human species progressed, the mother scripts of Latin and Sanskrit gained prominence and thus many modern languages ??grew under their influence. It is not clear how many human languages ??exist on Earth today or, for that matter, how many languages ??are dead today. Literature, as we understand it, is available in few languages. The advent of writing was another phenomenon. It is said that in the early stages of writing, writing was done on palm leaves, and pointed tips of hard materials such as bamboo branches were used to make impressions on the leaves. Developmental writing is a specialty in itself, it is not possible to attempt to document the various stages of writing here. One thing is clear, if only one thing is clear, that the writing of a language increases its durability. Language is a binding force between individuals and groups. It also attempts to integrate a range beyond the sounds of languages ??and the written scripts of languages. In most parts of the world, there may be a struggle for sovereignty among all human beings, among human groups, but certainly not over the value of any language. Within its boundaries any language, growing with each other, must be a binding force. It cannot be a force of mutual exclusion and hostility. Simply put, language is the vehicle of the mind.